Previous Issues
Volume :29 Issue : 97 2014
Add To Cart
Download
Methodical defects in Hadith narrating of The Orientalist ' Montgomery Watt in his two books 1 – Mohamed in Mecca and 2- Mohamed in Madina
Auther : Dr. Ne'maT Mohamed Al-Ja'fari
Methodical defects in Hadith narrating of The Orientalist ' Montgomery Watt in his two books
1 – Mohamed in Mecca and 2- Mohamed in Madina
Dr. Ne'maT Mohamed Al-Ja'fari
Prof. Assistant in Islamic culture Division – Education College – King Su'ood University Saudi Arabian Kingdom .
Orientalises have a long experience in research in Islamic Sciences and different cases along passing ages intending to disform and make suspicion in the shining picture of Islam in Muslems views which leads to limit embracing Islam for non – Muslems as it appears in critical readings of the orientalist Montgomery watt about Hadith narrations in His two books ( Mohamed in Mecca ) and ( Mohamed in Madinah , I found big difference between watt the orientalist and other orientalists in his methodology in writing and putting forward ideas and results reached . He differed in lots of results , critised and refuted their opinions . We find that his work is appreciated among Muslim learned people . That means he is some what objective . He appreciates Muslim opinions without accepting them . So muslims appreciate his sharing without sharing his opposing opinions .
Watt's positive view towards some events and historical occurrences which are deal with in historical events which he uses to refute some orientalists claims which are mixed with daring mistakes . Watt built on some wrong premises on which he did not give effort to prove its correctness and several results which need basic revision to get safe results . This is considered one of his incorrect results .
Watt seems to the level of technical and excellent in full meaning . He owns research tools and a critical style depending on admirable comparative critical style but at the same time he puts poison inside honey .